Speaking of which, the feminist glaciology study received more than $400,000 in grants.
-
-
-
No wonder Trump and may won, get this out to the public and they might even bring Boris back!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What’s meant to be absurd about the first one? I feel like to see that as absurd is to confuse the fact that society has done an absurd thing (decided that pumpkins are for white people) with the academics doing an absurd thing. They’re just studying the bizarre state of affairs!
-
I've never heard of pumpkins being only for white people. I'm actually quite fond of them myself.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The "anxiety of influence" meets publish or perish.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That Guardian collage is exhausting.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Paradoxically, then, what would be truly novel in today’s academic world...is the unadorned pursuit of truth!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well "truth" is usually incremental unless of course we are talking about revelations. And in the soft sciences the greatest visionary might not think three never before ideas even if they tryly great and vitally important work in looking afresh at current socioeconomic scene.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I just burst into laughter when I saw that title. "The perilous whiteness of pumpkins". What the hell? lol
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I got as far as "the symbolic whiteness associated with pumpkins" before a fell on the floor and nearly gave myself a hernia laughing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.