Twitter is never enough for serious arguments. Facebook is SLIGHTLY better. I'm referring to my comment and especially the "agonising care" part: https://www.facebook.com/groups/425504050908112/permalink/1012866372171874/?comment_id=1013094492149062&comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R%22%7D …
-
-
Replying to @jonsaxon67 @G_S_Bhogal
starts with "The ease at which people..." just in case it doesn't open at it (which it sometimes doesn't)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal
Did I ever mention how much I dislike Facebook?pic.twitter.com/BCf8xqTdch
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jonsaxon67
I agree with pretty much all of that. But it doesn't change the fact that there are actual written down laws, which you can yourself read, that Tommy contravened, not once, but twice (after being let off the first time). Was his sentence harsh? Yes. Was it unlawful? No.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal
You continue to ignore what I'm saying. Did you even stop to consider whether the law may not be that clear cut, or is the actual court ruling proof enough that there is no other way of viewing it? Did you stop to consider the strange circumstances?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jonsaxon67
I'm well aware that the law is not clear cut, and that much of it is up to the judge's discretion. It's something I learned as a child, because it's always been that way. It's impossible for a system composed of humans to be 100% consistent at all times.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal
So, why do you claim that its a "fact" he broke the law? Why do you claim that criticism is misplaced? Why do you ignore all warning flags in favour of "the law is the law" as if its all black and white?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jonsaxon67
(1) It is a fact that he broke the law-as-written. (2) The "criticism" that there's some kind of establishment conspiracy against Tommy is groundless. That doesn't mean the judge is not biased. (3) The "warning flags" are flimsy, and can't dispute the truth of (1).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal
(1) you just claimed the law isn't black and white, and now you say it is. (2) never made that claim (3) you call them flimsy while never once addressing them Otherwise its a nice bullet point list.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
1. The law-as-written in this case is pretty clear cut. Judge's discretion is not. 2. This is the narrative that is being widely promulgated. 3. Please name the warning flags I'm ignoring.
-
-
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal
1) BS 2) not by me, but you didn't notice it here, so what makes you think you got it right elsewhere? 3) I did at nauseating repetition. Its comical.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.