I was gonna say, ignore the nasty tone of the article. It discusses the legal matters in good depth, and that is what I wanted us to focus on. And yes, the law is biased. It always has been. But the fact remains, there is more than sufficient legal grounds for Tommy's sentence.
Tommy could have received a smaller sentence. So could anyone. Perhaps the judge didn't like him. It's a far cry from saying there's an active conspiracy by the establishment to silence Tommy. If that were true, Tommy would've been silenced long ago (he's been at it for a decade)
-
-
Who said anything about conspiracy? Its identity politics gone mad. Its absolute blindness of a large group of people. Its the unwillingness to stand for values. Its NOT some organised and orchestrated conspiracy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.