I'm scared if a person is put in jail this quickly for reporting truth, and that half the population justify it without any further information (or that "well, he broke the law... I was told" is enough to calm everyone down - its a testament to identity politics)
I was gonna say, ignore the nasty tone of the article. It discusses the legal matters in good depth, and that is what I wanted us to focus on. And yes, the law is biased. It always has been. But the fact remains, there is more than sufficient legal grounds for Tommy's sentence.
-
-
Ignore the tone??? You think that tone doesn't come with reporting bias? You think you are immune??? You are naive. You believe the "facts" you want and ignore others. You have done a great job of ignoring many of my claims and repeating "the law is the law".
-
Again, it'd be great if you could back up your claims with evidence. I've already pointed out the laws Tommy broke. Could you provide any exonerating circumstances?
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
You don't have to be in a court to be in contempt of it, btw. You can be "within the precincts of the building", which means outside it.
-
If you are going to bring an article that explains the MEANING of a law, then have the courtesy to read it and think about it. If you already made up your mind, then don't pretend otherwise. If a law is abused, then people should be worried instead of repeating "party lines".
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.