What did i say earlier? Hundreds of thefts occur everyday without recourse. Didn’t you know kids in high school who used to shoplift? Shit I know plenty and they got away with it. It didn’t start some crazy crime wave.
-
-
Replying to @GWalk84 @LyanneMelendez and
Ill repeat this for the final time then im out - you have sucked all of my energy for the day. the issue is with the attitudes of the people who think this is ok - NOT with the specific crime in the video. Altough, its a perfect example, because its not just simple shoplifting
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KingCardano @LyanneMelendez and
It’s more creative and bold than most shoplifters.... but not different really. As for your slippery slope. What will happen is some more people will take advantage and then the store will change policy and spend millions to lobby if they need legal assistance.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GWalk84 @LyanneMelendez and
loading up a garbage bag is creative? Bold, yes - BECAUSE THEY KNOW THE POLICY. You and I end up paying the millions in lobbying in the result of higher cost of goods... do you have any points bro? If not, go away
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KingCardano @LyanneMelendez and
The only point established in this entire thing argument is. You don’t like the store’s policy or the fact that people are exploiting it, and you especially don’t like a few loud radical voices defending it’s exploitation. That doesn’t make this interesting or news worthy.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GWalk84 @LyanneMelendez and
you have failed to disprove my original post. I never said you had to think it was newsworthy or interesting..pic.twitter.com/KHqsoxK6Bx
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KingCardano @LyanneMelendez and
I absolutely did. Your thesis: the only reason this guy got away with this and didn’t get shot is due to law and order. We established they legally could have stopped him. He got away because of a store policy which has absolutely nothing to do law and order.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GWalk84 @LyanneMelendez and
He is breaking the law. Without laws. He is a dead man. Period. End of story. Now go argue with your wife
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KingCardano @LyanneMelendez and
That is an absurd abstraction. But if you want to go down that route... Without laws the store wouldn’t exist and therefore the man wouldn’t be able to steal from anything.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GWalk84 @LyanneMelendez and
Ahhh there you got it. So let’s respect the laws. We agree. I’m glad you finally see it my way. The law must be preserved. This guy and anyone defending him is scum.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
That wasn’t your point and I never argued in defense of lawlessness. Your an odd duck. You see threats that aren’t there and make wild assumptions about people with no evidence... If your only point was “anarchy bad”. Then no shit Sherlock. No one advocated for that.
-
-
Replying to @GWalk84 @LyanneMelendez and
What threat am I seeing that isn’t there? You’re the whack job bro. I honestly think you need to seek some professional help. Please don’t message me again you’re creeping me out the way you can’t grasp simple concepts.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
,
,