Oh I get what you were saying now. No that’s not true either. I am agnostic to party. I pursue truth. Example: I loathe trump but I’ve also defended him when false accusations were made or he accidentally did something good. You seem to want to put me in a pre-labeled box.
The only point established in this entire thing argument is. You don’t like the store’s policy or the fact that people are exploiting it, and you especially don’t like a few loud radical voices defending it’s exploitation. That doesn’t make this interesting or news worthy.
-
-
you have failed to disprove my original post. I never said you had to think it was newsworthy or interesting..pic.twitter.com/KHqsoxK6Bx
-
I absolutely did. Your thesis: the only reason this guy got away with this and didn’t get shot is due to law and order. We established they legally could have stopped him. He got away because of a store policy which has absolutely nothing to do law and order.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
,
,