Merrick Garland.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You forgot to mention all the ones that have their nominations removed because of inappropriate behaviors or conflicts of interest. Maybe if the nominations were vetted ahead of time and were qualified for the positions more would be done.
-
Don’t forget the utter incompetent ones.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Seven years into Obama presidency and you didn’t let him place a Supreme Court nominee. Fair is fair.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's ok because in 400 days he has accomplished more that Obama and Bush did in 16 years!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When are you going to nominate someone qualified?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Please recap and release fannie mae / freddie mac, and respect the rule of law!pic.twitter.com/EsGwW92YCQ
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe you should try to bring in reputable people to fill the jobs. You know, folks who don't beat their wives and folks who don't take bribes from Russia.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Good thing his presidency is more than half over.
#TrumpColluded#TrumpRussiapic.twitter.com/VYvaErdSuI
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.