(Of course it needs to be good. This is Respawn and Stig Asmussen. I believe both have earned the benefit of trust. As for EA publishing, I think you underestimate Vince Zampella’s clout. It’s already showing: no mtx.
-
-
Pokaż ten wątek
-
Because I apparently need to clear this up: Spidey and GoW are first-party. You can stop citing them. Sekiro is a good exception to the trend of SP-only games falling short. RDR2? That has multiplayer AND mtx. Might not have GTAV/GTAO's legs, but it will bring in recurrent $.
Pokaż ten wątek -
Ok. Here we go. Games as a service is the current hot trend because of recurrent spending. For many games, mtx quickly overshadows revenue earned from initial purchase and/or provides a sustainable rev tail.
Pokaż ten wątek -
Fire-and-forget SP experiences monetize once. Publishers get your game purchase dollars (and maybe large-form DLC buy-in). The gap btw rev on GaaS and one-and-done games is massive and has changed the definition of “success.”
Pokaż ten wątek -
You want more SP/no mtx games? They have to be successes by current definition (and not what success looked like last gen and before).
Pokaż ten wątek
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
Its everything gamers have been asking for. I just hope they can get past the “its made by EA” element.
-
It’s made by Respawn. That should be enough.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
I mean it still needs to be a good game
-
No one is suggesting otherwise
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
Considering how many times EA burn players, I wont judge if they wont jump on the chance yet again for EA's PR
-
It’s Respawn, and those teams clearly know their shit.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.
Survived Order 66