Not to get into an argument here, but the early church does not seem to see it that way. With an odd exception, who's name escapes me right now. In any case, in all the writings we have, it was considered valid. That may not shift you from your position, but it's reason to pause
-
-
-
The name you're looking for is "Jesus"

-
I wasn't arguing Jesus commanded infant baptism, just the most of the early church thought he did...
-
I know, I was just poking at you.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Their are smarter people than I who can argue their side. I’m convinced for me, but it’s not a salvation issue, so....
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The things we Christians choose to debate/argue over on is mind boggling.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
*Triggers Lex
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In my household, I've a wife and a toddler.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There are a variety of additional connections, though I think that one is real:https://ibperry.wordpress.com/2015/11/16/a-defense-of-infant-baptism-november-2015/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Come talk to me when you’ve read Hodge and Turretin.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
You must shoehorn a covenant connection between circumcision and baptism to make it work. “Household” doesn’t necessitate babies and “children” doesn’t necessitate infants.