We'd like to look into it. Just to confirm, have you tried appealing the strike? Here's how: https://yt.be/help/k9jQ . Let us know.
-
-
Replying to @TeamYouTube
I sent a counter-notification claim. The content used in the video that the person is claiming was used in fair use, only a portion of the song was in the background of the video and parody/satire was added to the video. This person used the copyright takedown maliciously.
1 reply 1 retweet 24 likes -
Replying to @Jonathon_Hills @TeamYouTube
hang on a second. in your tweet you said "This band or music that was claimed was never in my live stream at all", but now you claim you did actually use the song in your stream?
@TeamYouTube , this guy's story keeps changing. very suspicious.3 replies 0 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @FurIncognito @TeamYouTube
I figured out the band was in the live stream for about 2 minutes, but was not used in full and was in the background of the video. It consituted under fair use.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @Jonathon_Hills @TeamYouTube
works that create new meaning for the source material are considered fair use. your problem is, you didn't create new meaning for the source material that you used in your video. you just used the source material in your own video and are monetizing it. you're boned.
2 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
Creating a "new meaning" is only one of the many ways you can be eligible for fair use. In this case, the music appeared in the background during a live stream, the entirety of the stream is based on a parody and therefore any content in the stream fits under the blanket term.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
that's a mighty fine theory you have. let's see if youtube agrees with you.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.