Francis FukuyamaVerified account

@FukuyamaFrancis

Senior Fellow at Stanford's Freeman Spogli Institute, and Mosbacher Director, Instagram: francis.fukuyama

Stanford, CA
francisfukuyama.com
Joined December 2011
62 Photos and videos Photos and videos

Tweets

You blocked @FukuyamaFrancis

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @FukuyamaFrancis

  1. Retweeted
    15 hours ago

    The U.S. calls for the immediate release of Nicaraguan opposition leaders Cristiana Chamorro, Arturo Cruz, Félix Maradiaga, Juan Sebastian Chamorro, and others. Our sanctions on members of the regime hold accountable those who carry out attacks on the Nicaraguan people.

    434 replies 812 retweets 2,698 likes
    Undo
  2. Retweeted
    23 hours ago

    Here it is, my *actual* final article for , with my reporting from Belgrade, on growing concerns re Chinese tech in so-called "safe city" programs. “Very delicate technology is in question which allows monitoring of the whole society—and enables a dystopian, Orwellian society"

    "[Smart city tech] represents the global expansion of the Chinese system of digital authoritarianism... the ability to control, surveil and coerce societies". One critic's view of the security risks in this longread by & me
    9 replies 21 retweets 90 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  3. Retweeted
    17 hours ago

    Please join CDDRL and for a special event on "The Ukrainian Fight for Democracy in the Black Sea Region" on Monday June 14 at 9am PDT/12pm EDT/7pm EEDT with and George Kent, to be moderated by . Register below!

    3 replies 11 retweets 34 likes
    Undo
  4. Jun 8

    Blocking the use of Prozorro is bad news:

    2 retweets 9 likes
    Undo
  5. Jun 8

    Latest blog post: Thinking about 2034

    5 replies 8 retweets 42 likes
    Undo
  6. Retweeted
    Jun 4

    Revisit 's post about Facebook sovereignty and the company's decision to de-platform Trump.

    3 retweets 7 likes
    Undo
  7. Retweeted
    Jun 2

    We need to become much more adept at anticipating and understanding the origins of pandemics, to prevent them. The uncertainty about future pandemics is not about if they will occur but rather, when, where and how, writes .

    3 replies 3 retweets 16 likes
    Undo
  8. Retweeted
    Jun 1

    Read ' latest blog on trusting science here:

    5 replies 11 retweets 18 likes
    Undo
  9. Retweeted
    Jun 1

    Read our statement on the grave danger to democracy:

    5 replies 78 retweets 131 likes
    Undo
  10. Retweeted
    Jun 1

    On Thursday, join and for a conversation on Fukuyama's AFTER THE END OF HISTORY, granting unprecedented access to one of the greatest political minds of our time

    1 reply 8 retweets 27 likes
    Undo
  11. Retweeted
    Jun 1

    What really happened in Wuhan? via (My Swamp Note with colleague premium but worth it)

    5 replies 31 retweets 93 likes
    Undo
  12. Retweeted
    Jun 1

    “Our entire democracy is now at risk. History will judge what we do at this moment.” The stakes for democracy reform couldn't be higher. Over 100 leading democracy scholars agree.

    39 replies 372 retweets 844 likes
    Undo
  13. May 31

    Latest blog post: Should we trust science? Not necessarily:

    12 replies 62 retweets 137 likes
    Undo
  14. Retweeted
    May 30

    We should remember our nation’s triumphs and atrocities. Remembering our triumphs helps give us hope. Remembering our sin gives us humility. Remembering both gives us the inspiration and motivation necessary to repair our land. Why we must remember Tulsa:

    72 replies 456 retweets 1,628 likes
    Undo
  15. Retweeted
    May 30

    How will citizen, community, & private sector demands and expectations of governments change after ? 🤔 Watch this discussion on the w/ , , &

    3 replies 5 retweets 12 likes
    Undo
  16. May 29

    Why American auto companies never really understood the purpose of lean manufacturing:

    5 replies 23 retweets 55 likes
    Undo
  17. Retweeted
    May 28

    At the panel debate in Aarhus states that: The problems with and polarisation can’t be solved by banning content or platforms. But the content handling from companies needs to be more transparent.

    1 reply 11 retweets 30 likes
    Undo
  18. Retweeted
    May 26

    This is an incredible clip

    109 replies 628 retweets 2,134 likes
    Undo
  19. May 26

    They should go back to banning all gain-of-function research. There's no justification for it.

    Apart from really bad PR, what would be the actual impact if it were determined that China’s leaky labs were the source of the virus? Reparations?
    6 replies 11 retweets 40 likes
    Undo
  20. May 26

    Is Wokeness ‘Kryptonite for Democrats’?

    7 replies 12 retweets 21 likes
    Undo

@FukuyamaFrancis hasn't Tweeted yet.

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·