Welcome to a thread where a bunch of man boys blame women for the Toronto van attacker. Apparently woman have an obligation to fuck unstable losers or we’re to blame when they murder people. https://twitter.com/goddoesnt/status/988798661160206336 …
So, the main thrust of this thread is a pretty great overview of the "Incel issue," although I'd question why one would recommend a subreddit called "IncelTears" as a place to really learn more. Don't get me wrong, I was looking at this whole mess last night and I sympathize...
-
-
...With these victims big-time. They deserve a place to share their stories, but recommending "IncelTears is a place for folks to submit screenshots (NOT direct links) of crazy stuff posted by self-described incels" is teaching about the negative consequences they've produced.
-
I would argue Incels are objectively wrong in their approach to women in general. They live on past events to say, "Well, I was nice, I was rejected, so I'll never try being nice again." I think the biggest question is how to defuse the situation, entirely. I have no answers.
-
The incel thing is somewhat of a smokescreen. I agree with the other guy who said that continuous humiliation both economic and personal with few if any alternatives is what leads people to act out like that. We could talk about that without even mentioning sex.
-
I would agree. However, we're presented with a particular case where this guy apparently hallucinated some "Incel Revolution", and emulated a previous terrorist. That's why, while it might only be one symptom of a larger problem, it's why we're grieving today as fellow Humans. :(
-
On this I have spoken my piece for today.
-
As have I. I hope you both have a great night. Now, I'm off to fight the dreaded Mongols in CK2. It's not about numbers, its about attritionless doomstacks.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.