Wow...making winter its own expansion pack? They better not...
-
-
Replying to @Iron_Cgull
*shrug* actually suggested something like that myself! So I can't really go back on that and be critical now...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Frimlin
You'd be happy paying upwards of $80 to get all the seasons? 0.o
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Iron_Cgull
Who knows, depends on how content rich and interesting each one was. I'm not as much a fan of Spring, for example.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Frimlin @Iron_Cgull
Also, Spring and Autumn could be combined into one. Or seasons could be introduced multiple times in different packs.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Frimlin
Even that I think would be the definition of EA milking us for all we're worth.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Iron_Cgull
If the content is reasonable, took effort and time to create, then it has a value and people have the choice to buy or not.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Frimlin
I think a line needs to be drawn somewhere. What next, a stuff pack with only beds and the heart bed as the premium content?
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @Iron_Cgull
There's a measure of content in each pack. If enough beds & associated things to fill the size of a stuff pack.. I might buy!
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Frimlin @Iron_Cgull
I wouldn't mind a bed SP to be honest :P There's still need of more beds! However, of course I agree!!!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I would absolutely be unhappy if I felt a pack was not compelling enough to justify the price. I just wouldn't buy it @Iron_Cgull
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Veteran games dev community manager & designer. Loves
He/Him