The 90's promise of cultural and capital acceleration completely fizzled out, which totally explains Lands position now. He seems to have handled that reality better than the rest of CCRU.
-
-
Is it really not a possibility or is that just to justify creative destruction as the highest form of acceleration?
-
'Creative destruction' is Capital's method, insofar as something like that can be ascertained. Merely Schumpeter's way of making Marx's grand and long-winded style pithy.
-
Creative destruction is a bust boom spiral no? So same question: is this really the highest form of acc?
-
'Highest' assumes some sort of hierarchy, so erring on the side of caution (as cunning) no. Creative destruction can certainly be regarded as a boom-bust spiral but is not reducible to it. Delineation between what processes seems to be acc/dec is crucial.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Lol I was talking about "accelerationism" in terms of cultural zeitgeist, which you absolute newbs would know if you'd done your research

-
lol culture is dependent on this process, c'mon bruh
-
Also to claim you understand any of this is, like, denying it's unimaginable complexity......making you a L/ACC revisionist IMO
-
Hence the use of 'oblique' , puny human manner of expressing some tenuous grasp of the sublime complexity involved.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
TRAJECTORIES FOR THE TRAJECTORY GOD
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
