FreakonomicsOvjeren akaunt

@Freakonomics

Subscribe to the Freakonomics Radio podcast for weekly episodes that explore the hidden side of everything — with host Stephen J. Dubner.

freakonomics.com
Vrijeme pridruživanja: travanj 2008.
879 fotografija ili videozapisa Fotografije i videozapisi

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @Freakonomics

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @Freakonomics

  1. 4. velj

    U.S. stock markets are up at least 1.7% today. Always hard to say exactly why, of course, but does anyone think it's connected to Iowa snafu? Possible logic: if Dems can't run one caucus vote, can they run the country?

    39 replies 15 proslijeđenih tweetova 103 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  2. 3. velj

    New study shows that taxes on e-cigarettes increase the purchase of traditional cigarettes: . Related: our episode "The Truth About the Vaping Crisis":

    8 proslijeđenih tweetova 14 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  3. 3. velj

    Why sports leagues can’t exist without collusion: can exist without , but the can’t exist without the .

    3 proslijeđena tweeta 17 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  4. 2. velj

    How did the go from worst to first so fast? It wasn’t an accident. Here’s how it happened:

    3 proslijeđena tweeta 28 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  5. 1. velj

    The are heading back to the after several years in the wilderness. How did they turn it around? We sat down with the team’s owner, management, and players to find out:

    6 proslijeđenih tweetova 29 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  6. 1. velj

    This week’s ep. is all about the : , Kyle Shanahan, , , , , , , , and Paraag Marathe.

    3 proslijeđena tweeta 12 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  7. 31. sij

    Most U.S. sports leagues are invitation-only cartels. Unlike the big soccer leagues, teams don’t get relegated out for poor performance, and unlike corporations, they face little real competition from upstarts and rivals.

    7 proslijeđenih tweetova 22 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  8. 31. sij

    How did the go from worst to first so fast? It wasn’t an accident. Here’s how it happened:

    1 reply 6 proslijeđenih tweetova 10 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  9. 31. sij

    Thanks. Curious why "Medication-Assisted Treatment" is on the "Stigmatizing Language" list while "Medication for Opioid Use Disorder/Alcohol Use Disorder" is on the "Non-Stigmatizing" list?

    Odgovor korisniku/ci @Freakonomics
    I'd love to see the podcast use more patient-centered and respectful language in your healthcare-related episodes. People are not their medical conditions. See for more information.
    9 replies 4 proslijeđena tweeta 16 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  10. 31. sij

    ., on losing the vs. losing other playoff games: “It’s weirdly easier to lose the Super Bowl because you can say, ‘We didn’t have our best game.’ There’s no ifs, ands, or buts, there’s no what-ifs.”

    2 proslijeđena tweeta 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  11. 30. sij

    Bad info like this? "The FDA, we should note, does recommend flushing opioids down the toilet as a final option, but what other choices are there?"

    the opioid episode segment on buy backs was interesting but gave bad info. FDA recommends flushing opioids. The water supply is fine. Active opioids are being eliminated down the drain all the time from our bodies
    1 proslijeđeni tweet 39 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  12. 30. sij

    This week’s ep. is all about the : , Kyle Shanahan, , , , , , , , and Paraag Marathe.

    1 proslijeđeni tweet 9 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  13. 30. sij

    The are heading back to the after several years in the wilderness. How did they turn it around? We sat down with the team’s owner, management, and players to find out:

    1 reply 5 proslijeđenih tweetova 13 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  14. 30. sij

    Hey Michael, you could try this: . Also, if you could send us a list of Michael-approved topics, we'll try to stick to them in future.

    how about how SF failed to deliver housing diversity promise. Get back to your roots, exploring meaningful topics, please.
    8 replies 2 proslijeđena tweeta 80 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  15. 30. sij

    How the San Francisco 49ers Stopped Being Losers (Update)

    1 reply 4 proslijeđena tweeta 14 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  16. 29. sij

    We already did that:

    Odgovor korisniku/ci @Freakonomics
    I would love to see an update from the Behavior Change for Good team . Freakonomics introduced me to them, and I’d like to hear what they’ve accomplished and what they still hope to accomplish.
    1 proslijeđeni tweet 8 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  17. 29. sij

    If you heard our 23andMe episode () it may not come as a surprise that the company is struggling (). Main problems seem to be privacy worries + biz model with no repeat biz (on retail side at least -- pharma deals are another story).

    5 proslijeđenih tweetova 24 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  18. 28. sij

    Need your input: if you were to come see a live Freakonomics Radio show, what are 3 things you'd like it to include (content and/or people)? Go!

    86 replies 10 proslijeđenih tweetova 37 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  19. 27. sij

    What is the long-term economic effect for a woman who wants an abortion but isn't able to get one? New NBER working paper: "The Economic Consequences of Being Denied an Abortion":

    26 proslijeđenih tweetova 57 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  20. 27. sij

    Harm reduction advocates in Philadelphia are hoping to open the U.S.’s first safe-injection facility. Peer counselor Nicole O’Donnell describes Safehouse as “a place to go for people to safely not overdose.”

    5 proslijeđenih tweetova 13 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi

@Freakonomics još nije objavio nijedan Tweet.

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·