Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @Francis_Aln

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @Francis_Aln

  1. 29. sij
    Poništi
  2. 25. sij

    Abdallah Zekri, délégué général du Conseil Français du Culte Musulman, financé par l'Etat français, affirme qu'une fille de 16 ans menacée de mort et empêchée de retourner à l'école pour avoir critiqué l'islam et dit une grossièreté, "l'a cherché", et que "maintenant elle assume"

    Poništi
  3. 8. sij

    Europe runs on traditions. The US runs on fads (or "memes" in Millenial/Silicon Valley speech)

    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    School for black civil rights activists; a girl being trained to not react to smoke blown in her face, Virginia, 1960.

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    20. pro 2019.

    It was 1969, Marshall McLuhan speaks of the electronic Global Village & the—tribalism—it would form. Interviewer: “It seems this tribal world is not friendly" Mr. McLuhan: “Oh no, tribal people one of their main sports is sort of butchering each other… Arduous interfaces."

    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    "It is said that the best horses lose when they compete with slower ones and win against better rivals. Undercompensation from the absence of a stressor,inverse hormesis, absence of challenge, degrades the best of the best." - Nassim Nicholas Taleb

    Poništi
  7. 19. pro 2019.

    Corporatocracy (of the anglo-saxon financial variety) marching forward

    Poništi
  8. 19. pro 2019.

    *At this point the thread is put on hold*

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. 19. pro 2019.

    At the same time there will also be celebration of traits linked to biology, while mentions of that link will be forbidden. Probably not a good example but to get started, it could be coded praise of trans women' athleticism or square jaws, which would be denounced by activists

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. 19. pro 2019.

    (n.b.: because it implies something negative *in the collective mind*) However certain characteristics will be celebrated. Vagina-associated genders will likely be associated with positive traits linked to born-with-vagina-people.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. 19. pro 2019.

    Equally bad will be to relate some sexes/genders to some (but not all) characteristics : it will be really bad to say "X and Y genders don't have the same private parts at birth" because implies something negative, just like saying X and Y ethnicities naturally smell differently

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. 19. pro 2019.

    What looks more clear is that denying the accepted beliefs on the subject will be akin to contemporary racism. For instance, saying that there are only two sexes (or three with intersex people), or only 5 sexes with trans people, instead of 7, 9, 12, ... will be bad.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. 19. pro 2019.

    As to competition and bickering among categories for underdog/victimhood status, it's hard for me to think about how harsh it will be. If we're talking beyond 10-20 years from now it seems pointless. Better to observe antiracist activism, e.g. current antisemitism controversies

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. 19. pro 2019.

    So technology, diversity activists expanding the number of categories and purity activists preserving categories will produce a larger landscapes of sex and genders, which will have better definitions than nowadays (with permanent controversy at the fringes as in racial matters)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 19. pro 2019.

    I now realise the obvious parallel between anti-cultural appropriation fights: "you didn't grow up and don't live in this culture everyday, quit trying to gain benefit from it !", and trans-exclusionary feminism: "you didn't grow up and don't live in this body everyday, ..."

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 19. pro 2019.

    Closed-to-those-without-a-vagina groups will deny transphobia, citing more or less objective reasons for the absence of trans women from their midst: "this is a discussion group for people with periods, not a transphobic 'female group'. We see ourselves as women, not female !"

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 19. pro 2019.

    So back to "sex exists" and "we must preserve women spaces": "women" (as in born-with-a-vagina) spaces will continue to exist, but not officially, just like racially segregated spaces continue to exist. Activists will decry "institutional transphobia" and "transblindness"

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 19. pro 2019.

    I think what will happen eventually is that the number of sexual and gender categories will expand all while being formalised, with people clearly assigned to non-overlapping categories. My analogy is Europe in the 20th century: more states than before, with ethnic cleansing

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 19. pro 2019.

    Fair-skinned children of Latinos and Whites are often claimed to be white. The valid existence of bisexuals is refuted by some homosexuals. Transgender activists are fighting with non-binary activists over the binary; TGs seem torn between diversity promotion & binary adherence

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 19. pro 2019.

    Sex and gender diversity is a real trend, just like racial diversity. There is a countervailing trend to this in identity purity ideologies. Within all movements, people are trying to preserve categories. You have Blasians (Black Asians), but they are often reclaimed as Black

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·