hey @FrancescoC @ErlangSolutions @bryan_hunter have you seen this? https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/elixir-lang-talk/tG-mshfM2FQ … I'd love to see it with megacores :)
-
-
Replying to @knewter
@knewter@ErlangSolutions@bryan_hunter concurrency gone mad. Use c for matrix operations:-)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FrancescoC
@FrancescoC wasn't about raw computational performance, more about seeing how distributing the load worked across diff # cores :)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rossjones
@rossjones unless those computations are massive and take lots of cpu power, your overheads of spawning a process are larger than the gains.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FrancescoC
@FrancescoC I should publish the sequential numbers too, just don't want anyone else to think it is trying to measure computation.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rossjones
@rossjones Look at Kostis Sagonas' talk from the EUC from 2-3 years ago.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @FrancescoC
@FrancescoC this one I guess - http://youtu.be/VrwS_8ESPjQ - thx for the pointer1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@rossjones yes. Lots has happened since, but many were caught by surprise at the results.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.