hey @FrancescoC @ErlangSolutions @bryan_hunter have you seen this? https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/elixir-lang-talk/tG-mshfM2FQ … I'd love to see it with megacores :)
-
-
Replying to @knewter
@knewter@ErlangSolutions@bryan_hunter concurrency gone mad. Use c for matrix operations:-)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FrancescoC
@FrancescoC wasn't about raw computational performance, more about seeing how distributing the load worked across diff # cores :)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rossjones
@rossjones unless those computations are massive and take lots of cpu power, your overheads of spawning a process are larger than the gains.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FrancescoC
@FrancescoC but the charts/numbers do show it does well on large matrices - which was sort of the point2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rossjones
@rossjones ahmdal's law. Most apps tend to scale linearly to 8-16 cores, after which they hit their bottleneck. Yours is the controller.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FrancescoC
@FrancescoC yup, understood - have a bigger machine for me to play with? I only have access to 121 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@rossjones http://www.erlang-factory.com/euc2015/kostis-sagonas … soon, for the masses :-)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.