hey @FrancescoC @ErlangSolutions @bryan_hunter have you seen this? https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/elixir-lang-talk/tG-mshfM2FQ … I'd love to see it with megacores :)
@rossjones unless those computations are massive and take lots of cpu power, your overheads of spawning a process are larger than the gains.
-
-
@FrancescoC but the charts/numbers do show it does well on large matrices - which was sort of the point -
@rossjones ahmdal's law. Most apps tend to scale linearly to 8-16 cores, after which they hit their bottleneck. Yours is the controller. -
@FrancescoC yup, understood - have a bigger machine for me to play with? I only have access to 12 -
@rossjones http://www.erlang-factory.com/euc2015/kostis-sagonas … soon, for the masses :-)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@FrancescoC I should publish the sequential numbers too, just don't want anyone else to think it is trying to measure computation. -
@rossjones Look at Kostis Sagonas' talk from the EUC from 2-3 years ago. -
-
@rossjones yes. Lots has happened since, but many were caught by surprise at the results.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.