Is there a canonical or idiomatic way to deal with third party libraries in Erlang from both a development and distribution perspective?
-
-
Replying to @Crad
@Crad Last I looked it was JungErl, and that was like 2005 or maybe 2003 :) Better ask@FrancescoC1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Crad1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @FrancescoC
@FrancescoC@tapoueh that's a bummer. A more concrete way to deal with this stuff would most likely lead to more adoption.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.