People seem to hammer on "tooling" as a big issue with Erlang yet seem to have nothing to say about the massive improvements over the past few years. Perhaps it's time to stop repeating this idea blindly.
-
-
Well that’s a sign of progress
-
The moaning or better tooling? :-)
-
If they were still asking about books, we’d be in a bad place
-
Human nature. Some people will never be happy regardless of the effort which has been put in and always find excuses. They know who they are, and unfortuantely, will probably not be reading this reply :-)
-
Every single day I praise Erlang for having fundamentally reformed the way I think about problems. It gave me an unexpected toolkit for uniting logic programming, DSL design, rigorous testing methods, and complex async systems (which is every non-trivial system).
-
This is inline with what I told my students this week.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Forgot about no developers :P
-
I was writing a blog post about building teams using non mainstream programming languages with Erlang co-inventor Mike Williams and it ended up being a 25 page essay!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.