But should America dictate terms?
Regardless what you think of the motivation for the timing of the “Deal of the Century״-those of us who care about peace between Israelis and Palestinians- should give it a chance. Only America can make it happen. Let’s hope both the Israelis and the Palestinians decide to engage
-
-
-
Laying out a suggested resolution does not mean “dictating” terms.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Serious question: given what we’ve heard, why should Palestinians engage?
-
let's see: Hamas HATES PLO, PLO HATES Hamas, aren't they "engaging?"
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Does it not matter if this is being presented disingenuously, with no serious intention to negotiate or implement? If this were the case, isn't there a price to "giving it a chance" as it relates to future, good-faith peace efforts?
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
You are a joke.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
I think we would give it more of a chance if it seemed like a "peace plan" instead of a conflict management/unilateral annexation plan. The Palestinians are not even at the table and Israel has no government. If you care about peace, you can't help but worry about this.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
I agree with you, Mr. Foxman. My one question is how is this different Oslo or Camp David which was so condemned by Bibi and his supporters. I support Trump's plan but I must ask why now and not years ago.
-
add the from before Oslo
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Sorry Abe,
#Trump is trading on our future to distract from his precarious situation. A desperate move by a desperate man is not the honorable path to a solution here.Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.