They're refusing to do their job because someone hasn't broken a law?
-
-
-
They can do as they please. Its an off duty job. Try again
-
I wasn't trying anything but try to understand the situation more clearly. Stopping for 1 person action seems OTT.
-
seems absurd that we are worried about 268>6000
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
LAME. You would put the public in harms way, just to prove a point. New low.
-
how will the public be put in harms way?
-
with all do respect. Did you even read the article?
-
yes ma'am I did. It is a voluntary position, meaning that if no one volunteers the 49ers provide their own security
-
but, they're backing out because of one player. Show more loyalty to the team and fans.
-
if you want to debate loyalty not safety that's fine. Why do they owe any loyalty to the 49ers?
-
It's not loyalty to the 49ers but loyalty to the community or the idea: Protect and Serve!
-
they are still protecting and serving the community. Again this is a volunteer position
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
it's their right to, 2ndA goes both ways
-
I think you mean first amendment, but true, goes both ways
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I don't blame them
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Don't Threaten! JUST DO IT!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
for government agents, free speech is okay as long as they agree. Disagreeable speech on the other hand makes them angry. LOL
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
all fans should have a sit out and boycott game
#BoycottNFL, get in their money maker, NFL will stop him thenThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.