Since when do we pay ransom to anybody. It shows weakness that others will certainly capitalize on.
-
-
-
I don't know why any American would step foot in a middle eastern country.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
.Or elect a President with enough balls to protect Americans.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I agree! It was a ransom. By definition.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
thought Reagan said we don't negotiate with terrorists. Thought we was supposed to kick butt to get em back.
-
this was a ransom. No doubt.
-
&we look ripe 4 the http://pickings.How can any American now travel w/o worrying about being kidnapped 4 ransom
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No. Bottom line is this puts more Americans at risk. They will now kidnap more cuz U.S. will pay $$ for them.
-
yes. That too!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@Midwood49@RLHeinrichs Did any1 try & make a better deal ORielly? Now, AMERICANS in more danger!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
so money for hostage is not a ransom? Who worked the Iran deal? Dumb and dumber?
-
oh it was a ransom. Absolutely.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yes, we would have gotten them it when a "Reagan" returned to the White House.
-
I think that's probably right. My point was this was a tit for tat. A ransom
-
Agree, and you just can't do it. No principle involved.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
so you want to keep the money instead of getting our people back. You can't have it both ways. Either dead or alive
-
encourage you to watch the whole segment. In this specific exchange, it was $ for hostages. A ransom.
-
so you want to keep the money instead of getting our people back. You can't have it both ways. Either dead or alive
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.