No it's not it's just the choice is made to make it easy.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Man STEPS FORTH to PROVE Killarys Election Fraud & The Court Tries VIGOROUSLY TO CUT HIM OFF!https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=P4cg9CwsEy0 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Especially when there is so little of it.
@brianstelter stop them from saying this crap.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
THANK YOU BLANK PANTHERS FOR OBAMA AT POLLS YET NO WORRIES ABOUT VOTER FRAUD THEN?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
All the more reason for requiring voter ID. Honest politician would support requirements. Others intend 2 rig votes!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also very hard to pin anything on the Clintons. Political magicians.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ballot-box intimidation by Obama supporters was blatantly obvious & Hillary supporters must not do it this year.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Picture Voter ID would be a good start. As long as we have Liberal judges, that will never happen.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I have an idea. Friggin state issued picture ID. Not that hard.
@FoxNews@kimguilfoyle -
, a lot of the states passed voter ID and didn't want to pay for citizens to get them. If you really mean it, fund it, right?
-
I mean, if you are legal, are who you say are, you walk into DMV, picture ID costs about 20 bucks in most states.
@JustinPhllps -
that's all fine and dandy, but some ppl can't even afford that. That's still a reality in the US. States should have paid.
-
.
@JustinPhllps let me be clear. NO NO NO !!! I know not one soul who can't get 20 bucks if it is important. Not one. -
aye that's the truth. If the states would have funded, their biased bill, then they wouldn't have been struck down by SCOTUS!
-
.
@JustinPhllps that would be true if@Scotus had not already violated the constitution be rewriting legislation in regards to obomacare -
Supercourt used the Commerce Clause to validate Obamacare. Perfectly Constitutional. Living document my friend.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.