Your tweets suck. Try complete thoughts.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There are no "acceptable losses" when you're not truly fighting an enemy. You fight or you don't. End of story.
-
tell that to your bush
-
At least he was able to say who the enemy was and let the military do their job.
-
oh Jesus there is no reason for that war. Fake wmd
-
Then what did Saddam use for chemical weapons against people in the '80s, if he didn't have them?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"Acceptable Loses" - "Collateral Damage"; guess "Acceptable Loses" polls more favorably...
-
Obama NEVER said that. Bill O'Reilly did. the Bigoted Pig.
-
That most certainly is Obama's view of conflict on a global level; calculated tolerance.... Cont'd.
-
Absolutely False. Why do you think he got us OUT of war & into a multi national coalition to fight ISIS.
-
Him bailing on Iraq led to ISSI'S Genesis; Coalition, there's no coalition - smoke and mirrors...
-
no the war in Iraq created ISIS
-
John McCain tried to warn Dick Cheney & George Bush!pic.twitter.com/tR9au9ybM3
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
oh yes. Collateral damage. Innocent people being murdered are accepted in the long term plan. Come clean Obama
-
Obama didn't say that Bill O'Reilly said that. Filthy Bigot
-
I'm saying what I been thinking for a while. They appear to accept murder of innocents.
-
They who?
@Foxnews &@oreillyfactor ? Yes I agree. They like to play w/the truth also. Because@rupertmurdoch is a foreigner -
not them I'm talking about the government. And it's acceptable damage for their plan
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.