Only having clearance is not sufficient to get access to secret materials. You also need need-to-know and that ends when the employment ends. This means that keeping the clearance is not an issue.
-
-
-
So if it is “not an issue” - why should they keep it? Duh!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
That’s not how clearance works. It’s not a pass to classified info it just means that your authorized to view certain classified information. For example if the current FBI director needs advice on something only the former FBI director would have experience with he can ask him.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Is
@RepAndyBiggsAZ one of those Moscow mules?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's really troubling, just think of the 100's of security clearances . It is a wonder anything at all is top secret! Do they have access whenever they want it? Must they be invited? What if they have been involved in questionable activities after leaving office? Mind boggling!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A congressman on the house judiciary committee that doesn’t understand why former intelligence officials need to have security clearance after being employed. Either he’s lying or he’s incompetent.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thank You

Exactly 
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Another side issue. The real question is, who can we blame for a broken presidency?
-
Everyone focused on vilifying this man, is cut from the same cloth as Trump. The inability to admit a mistake is pathetic, but to search for a scapegoat is reprehensible.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.