Ensuite, ils devraient rejeter tout avantage obtenu grâce aux syndicats. Ils le veulent dans les deux sens. Va les baiser. Then they should reject any benefit that came thanks to unions. They want it both ways. Fuck them.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
divide & conquer...they make it sound like they've done something good...but if members stop paying dues, the unions will close up shop, then the employees will have no one to fight for them, the EMPLOYERS will have ALL THE POWER, ALL THE SAY, ALL THE RIGHTS...THE RICH GET RICHER
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The face of the guy who screwed the country out of their pensions..pic.twitter.com/VGcXkWrAY7
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Actually without unions, corporations pay less and take away benefits. Union brothers and sisters pay 37 a month and make twice as much not including benefits than non-union. I made 27 non union, no medical. 50 hrly UNION with benefits.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This case is up there with Roe versus Wade. First off it's paramount we protect rights of the individual. Secondly, Unions are doing a service to employees and as such they should be held accountable for not being fiduciary. This will bring Competitive - Collective Bargaining
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.