BTW, the burden of proof should be on those claiming fraud. Not the other way around. (though it's easily debunked.)
Conversation
I mean, there are statutes and stuff. We don't have to argue about burden of proof on twitter (but yes, burden on claimant)
1
3
Mass voter suppression is the new normal & the conversation we should be having thelondoneconomic.com/tle-pick/donal
Disagree. It's the modern age where everything is hacked. Every close state in a presidential election should be audited.
I'm not sure if anybody's claiming fraud. (?) We're asking for some extra checking. A second blood test.
Yes. Tho' maybe 'stead of hot takes & retread of prev. pts, do deeper dive into what actual fraud could look like?
1
have you seen what’s going on in NC? The burden is always on the dems right now regardless of who’s making the claim.
3
Amusing that the side that was saying "rigged" now rollis eyes while the side saying "accept" now is flipping out
Burden of proof should have also been on the guy claiming our President was an illegal Kenyan immigrant.
why do you argue the burden of proof ought to be the same as a defendant? Verifying a very strange election not the same