Debatable. Are you going to step in and stop/force/change me? With what enforcement? What about a million me? What if we become a minority with veto rights in the model? Do you fork us off the social chain like the DAO hack?
-
-
Replying to @FluidFluxation
I think of the possibility of setting the veto threshold requirements in relation to the amount of stolen property such that the thieves can't hope to gain from paying for veto power etc.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SoakerPatoshi
Interesting. Doesnt combat too big to fail institutional theives, and geopolitical cabals from undue influence. Especially entering a hyper consumeristic attention economy.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FluidFluxation
You think the governments will get together to collude against the system?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SoakerPatoshi
People within governments with self interest and powers to protect. You think they won't?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FluidFluxation
To be meaningful it would have to be US cooperating with China and each in turn with Russia and so on. North Korea, South Korea etc...is this what you suggest could happen? That this is a danger in regard to mutability movements?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SoakerPatoshi
I'm still not sure this whole model is ideal for society and advancement. It may be morally ideal, and truly just within its own self defined goals, but I think we departed a few steps back. I'm still always interested in fleshing out your ideas.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FluidFluxation
It is morality defined by 'that which we all agree on' it is hardly a definition one could reasonably disagree with.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SoakerPatoshi
I may not disagree with your definition, but still be doubtful of its optimization/value as an instrument of changing bitcoin immutability, or concerned with tradeoffs. Whats wrong with currently immutable model?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FluidFluxation
It will give nefarious people enormous amounts of power if the market cap usurps gold. For that reason I think bitcoin cannot grow to such levels without muting the stolen coins.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Valid. I like that your thinking towards a solution. Look forward to reading more.
-
-
Replying to @FluidFluxation
We could think about the effects on the psychology of the thieves as the community started to embrace a threat of such policy.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SoakerPatoshi @FluidFluxation
See people call for seperation of money and state
@NickSzabo4 shows such a separation between law and money to be essentially absurd.0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.