Well a general doubt that an ideal fair consensus model of morality and justice is optimal for civilization and progression. Most fair, perhaps. Most advanced/effective? Dubious. I like the woods your exploring, not sure this aggregate is optimal.
-
-
Replying to @FluidFluxation
So given the premise that it is a jury system that never gets its judgements wrong and always pays out properly judgments would you agree to relinquish immutability to it? We MUST be reasonable. Must!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SoakerPatoshi
Never gets judgements wrong relative to its internal structure, an abstraction of the world structure. If I disagree with the moral views of the entire world, should I relinquish my own views, to remain reasonable? Dangers flirting with freedom of thought and the human spirit.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FluidFluxation
Should the whole world be held hostage to your subjective protest/complaint?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SoakerPatoshi
Debatable. Are you going to step in and stop/force/change me? With what enforcement? What about a million me? What if we become a minority with veto rights in the model? Do you fork us off the social chain like the DAO hack?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FluidFluxation
I think of the possibility of setting the veto threshold requirements in relation to the amount of stolen property such that the thieves can't hope to gain from paying for veto power etc.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SoakerPatoshi
Interesting. Doesnt combat too big to fail institutional theives, and geopolitical cabals from undue influence. Especially entering a hyper consumeristic attention economy.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FluidFluxation
You think the governments will get together to collude against the system?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SoakerPatoshi
People within governments with self interest and powers to protect. You think they won't?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FluidFluxation
To be meaningful it would have to be US cooperating with China and each in turn with Russia and so on. North Korea, South Korea etc...is this what you suggest could happen? That this is a danger in regard to mutability movements?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
But to this specific point, I think any level of unprecedented collusion should be anticipated, your proposing shifting a major world power base to a unified social structure. Society has never had this. Wild west/uncharted space.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.