Well a general doubt that an ideal fair consensus model of morality and justice is optimal for civilization and progression. Most fair, perhaps. Most advanced/effective? Dubious. I like the woods your exploring, not sure this aggregate is optimal.
I'm still not sure this whole model is ideal for society and advancement. It may be morally ideal, and truly just within its own self defined goals, but I think we departed a few steps back. I'm still always interested in fleshing out your ideas.
-
-
It is morality defined by 'that which we all agree on' it is hardly a definition one could reasonably disagree with.
-
I may not disagree with your definition, but still be doubtful of its optimization/value as an instrument of changing bitcoin immutability, or concerned with tradeoffs. Whats wrong with currently immutable model?
-
It will give nefarious people enormous amounts of power if the market cap usurps gold. For that reason I think bitcoin cannot grow to such levels without muting the stolen coins.
-
Valid. I like that your thinking towards a solution. Look forward to reading more.
-
We could think about the effects on the psychology of the thieves as the community started to embrace a threat of such policy.
-
See people call for seperation of money and state
@NickSzabo4 shows such a separation between law and money to be essentially absurd.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.