IF we had an ideal justice institution that was never wrong and never corruptible in its morality judgements it would be foolish not to give it control of bitcoin mutability. What is more ideal than a jury of our peers?
Never gets judgements wrong relative to its internal structure, an abstraction of the world structure. If I disagree with the moral views of the entire world, should I relinquish my own views, to remain reasonable? Dangers flirting with freedom of thought and the human spirit.
-
-
Should the whole world be held hostage to your subjective protest/complaint?
-
Debatable. Are you going to step in and stop/force/change me? With what enforcement? What about a million me? What if we become a minority with veto rights in the model? Do you fork us off the social chain like the DAO hack?
-
I think of the possibility of setting the veto threshold requirements in relation to the amount of stolen property such that the thieves can't hope to gain from paying for veto power etc.
-
Interesting. Doesnt combat too big to fail institutional theives, and geopolitical cabals from undue influence. Especially entering a hyper consumeristic attention economy.
-
You think the governments will get together to collude against the system?
-
People within governments with self interest and powers to protect. You think they won't?
-
To be meaningful it would have to be US cooperating with China and each in turn with Russia and so on. North Korea, South Korea etc...is this what you suggest could happen? That this is a danger in regard to mutability movements?
-
I'm still not sure this whole model is ideal for society and advancement. It may be morally ideal, and truly just within its own self defined goals, but I think we departed a few steps back. I'm still always interested in fleshing out your ideas.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.