IF we had an ideal justice institution that was never wrong and never corruptible in its morality judgements it would be foolish not to give it control of bitcoin mutability. What is more ideal than a jury of our peers?
-
-
Replying to @SoakerPatoshi
That's a big ideal. Easier to make maths, protocols and code idea, than humans. Especially given such widely different stances on what is justice. I think ideal money is a more unifiable concept than ideal people/judgement.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FluidFluxation
We learn from Smith's Toms there is no higher moral judge than the impartial observer, and the most impartial observer we have is the aggregate of our society. IOW if no minority vetos, and minorities have veto power, then the decision cannot be said to be immoral/unjust.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SoakerPatoshi
Depending on how minority and veto exist in this model, sure. But if its liberal enough to be an all inclusive aggregate, you will never have a no veto situation on matters like bitcoin immutability.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FluidFluxation
I think what you said is it would have to appease many many people for a case to be decided that muting is just which I think is the perfect protection versus any complaint of "starting a bad precedent".
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SoakerPatoshi
Sure once the proposal is adopted and youve somehow solved implementation/enforcement of it. If min/veto ideal justice structure exists prior, I would veto such effort to bring bitcoin under the structures control.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FluidFluxation
Based on the morality of what principle? Keeping in mind you would have an ideal justice system.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SoakerPatoshi
Well a general doubt that an ideal fair consensus model of morality and justice is optimal for civilization and progression. Most fair, perhaps. Most advanced/effective? Dubious. I like the woods your exploring, not sure this aggregate is optimal.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FluidFluxation @SoakerPatoshi
If we can define idealness in systems, why shouldnt we shoot higher than aggregate of people. For devils advocate, I could argue we should explore this model, but keep the council toothless, and train AIs on its work over a few decades.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
As bitcoin can effectively mediate confusion of international value, we need something better than a most fair mechanism to mediate confusion of interpersonal morality.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.