So when you semi subsidize an (essential) service, you are providing it training wheels to compete in the markets. If the handicap is enough to offset market deterioration, your system will Clearly the US Edu model was not built with robust geopolitic competitiveness in mind.
-
-
Even if your intentions/process was pure, can you imagine campaigning on mandatory male sperm restrictions? Or vice versa with Ovaries although the pro life movement has already paved some cultural roadways for former.
-
They will try and it will work on the sheep. But by then most of the wealth and the brains will have left totalitarian jurisdictions for more freedom loving ones, or completely started their own sovereign enclaves.
-
Our tribe will be fine. Are we comfortable leaving millions of mindless idiotic poors to fend for themselves in a collapsing system? If we are building to a future global computation dynamic, can we tolerate those loses? And to what extent? Personally, I'd like to capture
$IT -
-
*Please secure your own air mask before tending to your children* Seems appropriate.
-
Turns out you guys are super depressing on Sunday mornings. Holy crap. Lemme get some coffee. When is all his happening?
-
Its mothers day. Were just thinking of the children.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.