Agree fundamentally, would argue that shit teacher pay preceded digital learning explosion. Fundamentally, the public schooling system model in America was built to fail. Just took a decade or two for innovation to fill gaps. This argument does apply to rising college costs tho.
As sound theorist, which I believe we both are, to what extent is loss tolerable in a great filter scenario? 1% loss? 10? 25? 50? I have not reconciled my views here, am not sure where I stand. Self preservation, I'm sure I'll be .01% & fine. I worry for my peers.
-
-
This isn’t a decision that is up to us to make. This is a decision that Mother Nature will make using the processes of the market (a natural force comprised of all human interactions with each other and their environment).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I trend towards accelerationism on most counts, but Idk that my models tolerate a 20%+ drop in consumers. We are also addressing (semi privileged) poors in a wealthy country. This discussion doesn't begin to address "3rd world" economies.
-
A mass filtering that kills 20% ignorant/poor/etc in America means multitudes more in China and India unless the filter policies are immensely localized (unlikely).
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.