Worst case my understanding is that it'd fairly elementary to increase the amount of decimals the protocol supports if needed. I agree w the premise that the chain split resulted in alternate timelines w disparate temporality rates but curious why you imply there's a "lifespan"?
-
-
Yes and no. When it comes to the technical capability of gaming a DA, that’s well known and scales beautifully. There’s no need to summon economic animal spirits and incite them to perform game theory gymnastics. Theory changes as networks mature.
-
For instance, back before Bitmain people cheered the possibility of big miners in competition.Satoshi screwed up with the theory of a 51% “attack” as it made miner collusion to keep the protocol stable as somehow hostile. Totally unfortunate misnomer and we can see the result
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
that should be value-risk not value/risk
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.