@FluidFluxation Listen. I have ZERO patience for someone that would call @adam3us a charlatan. I would keep such sentiments to yourself if you want this channel open.
Thing is, I don't think I've been very critical of the party in question. I'm happy to address any comments I've made to the contrary. I may have been over the line on some comments, but I don't think my general thesis or tuning fork is as off base as you seem to imply.
-
-
I don't want to hear about.
-
I'm just here to build bridges and connect minds. I feel your ideas compliment my own, and vice versa, when fully understood. I can't force you to engage me, and won't waste excessive time trying to do so.
-
I am here to help us understand Nash's proposal with no interest in entertaining alternate views.
-
I don't think your fundamental views conflict with mine(esp with Nash) yet we seem to have a conflict because i addressed the dominant majority thought channels (BTCcore) as having serious ontological and technical conflicts.
-
You wont' stop talking about this....I and don't fucking want to hear it.
-
Help me learn you. What is it that I won't stop talking about and what do you object to in this context?
-
Your sentiments about block stream. I expect your next tweet and every subsequent tweet pinging me to now include any of such content. You free to feel as you wish and I am free to manage my feed the same.
-
Taking this a step away from blockstream. Do you think bitcoin will continue to maintain it's adoption edge if the scaling roadmap continues towards LN frameworks? I have a genuine concern that this becomes Fiat2.0 and lightning IOUs displace Bitcoin networm effect at scale.l
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.