@FluidFluxation Listen. I have ZERO patience for someone that would call @adam3us a charlatan. I would keep such sentiments to yourself if you want this channel open.
Help me understand your position. What is the line here? I'm am genuinely engaging you, and have no desire for trolling or undue conflict.
-
-
Man you don't understand, you are criticizing one of the most important persons in regard to bitcoin and the cypherpunk movement that created blockstream (as I understand). I'm not going to re-wire your thinking on this-I couldn't care less of your ignorance.
-
Thing is, I don't think I've been very critical of the party in question. I'm happy to address any comments I've made to the contrary. I may have been over the line on some comments, but I don't think my general thesis or tuning fork is as off base as you seem to imply.
-
I don't want to hear about.
-
I'm just here to build bridges and connect minds. I feel your ideas compliment my own, and vice versa, when fully understood. I can't force you to engage me, and won't waste excessive time trying to do so.
-
I am here to help us understand Nash's proposal with no interest in entertaining alternate views.
-
I don't think your fundamental views conflict with mine(esp with Nash) yet we seem to have a conflict because i addressed the dominant majority thought channels (BTCcore) as having serious ontological and technical conflicts.
-
You wont' stop talking about this....I and don't fucking want to hear it.
-
Help me learn you. What is it that I won't stop talking about and what do you object to in this context?
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.