-
-
Thank you, I hadn't heard that one. I like Eric Weinstein.
-
I'm such a fan. Love that he's circulating within that sphere of commentators. He adds a needed substance and spice to the discussion.
-
Yes substance. I'm under the impression that unlike the people he recently appeared with on Dave Rubin's show, he deals with more money (albeit perhaps not his own) as part of his job? In that sense perhaps he has more skin in the game. Anyway, all and all an interesting person.
-
He certainly has more financial skin in the game than his peers here. That gives him capacity to think competently about those a notch above him, the 9-10 figure bracket. There's a lot of nuance and insight he can provide at level none of the others have exposure to.
-
I doubt Peterson is regularly bending the ear of Peter Thiel and company. Lots of value in his network and exposure.
-
Inequality & the capital/social scheme is analogous [to society's] dipole moment (separation of positive and negative charges). When you have a significant enough charge separation, there is rearrangement, leading to a redistribution of charge in the cluster as a whole.
-
I'm surprised
@EricRWeinstein hasn't applied symmetry and physics to society yet. (In)equality is a dipole moment. http://iopscience.iop.org/book/978-1-6817-4509-1/chapter/bk978-1-6817-4509-1ch1 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Without*
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.