If this were true, how could bitcoin align with a dollar signal and satisfy Mises regression?https://twitter.com/_Kevin_Pham/status/1004528183583150080 …
-
-
Yes, bitcoin incentivises self regulation or 'natural order' but I think this is different to the notion of surveillance being suggested here. Nice link tho

-
Lots of large stacks of coin moved in and out of coinbase over the last 6 years. Every deposit/withdraw address used is in a 3 letter agency log. Blockchain forensics is a growing science. Ppl attempting to leave the system will be Targetted retroactivelyhttps://twitter.com/FluidFluxation/status/1004632358610448384?s=19 …
-
Who will we/they be targeted by?
-
Nation state tier interests, or hackers that access the data. Ppl with 1000s of coins will become increasingly targeted by all threats as the price grows. Irreversible transactions are a theives dream.
-
A conflation of government and criminals will target hodlers?
-
Yes. And the govs/criminals will also target each other. Custody solutions may become mainstream as a result of a violent climate. The cyber attack surface may become far too large to be reasonably defended by the individual, prompting users to sign their keys to the banks.
-
Ok, this sounds a bit more understandable - not sure I agree with it, but it is certainly less disagreeable than I first thought. So if the banks were to act as custodians of private keys in this way, it means they are adopting a differing value standard? A new trend, even?
-
Sure, all these properties exist dynamically around the wave of what's arriving. Right now using bitcoin cryptography and sanitized key generation/storage is good enough. Hard to be truly safe in a world where every* computer is backdoored though https://twitter.com/desantis/status/948703838965559297?s=19 …
This Tweet is unavailable. - 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.