Maybe "rewrite it in Rust" is annoying, but from my point of view "Rust doesn't prevent every bug ever, so you should just use C or C++" is much more annoying.
-
-
I'm a small team and its a VAST improvement over C (or C++). My code is much more stable.
-
That's why I run my C code through static analyzers, ASAN, UBSAN and TSAN ;) But that's not the point, I agree that C is "too loose" and would love more compile-time memory safety options. It's just that Rust has too many things I know I will never need nor use... [1/...]...
- Još 25 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I agree - simple languages can prevent bugs and can have other benefits like fast compile times. C and Go are good examples of that I think.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.