Starting to think that dispelling the myth of bernie Sanders will be even more difficult than destroying the myth of Barack Obama.
-
-
En réponse à @SarcasmStardust
I think there’s a difference between acknowledging his shortcomings which were plenty & Obama who bombed/droned the hell out of countries and took us from 2-7 wars. People shouldn’t worship him but he is the reason we are having this conversation. He put issues on the map...
4 réponses 3 Retweets 30 j'aime -
En réponse à @Fiorella_im @SarcasmStardust
Bernie has supported US intervention in over a dozen countries! Bernie is objectively more right-wing than previous Dem candidates but gained more popularity because Americans' material conditions are much shittier now than before...
2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @nucholibre @SarcasmStardust
He really isn’t. You can say he’s opposed Us interventionism In bundled bills trying to pass one part of what’s good. That’s how it works. He definitely didn’t target the MIC as much as he should have (granted all who did are now dead) but to say he’s more right wing? False.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @Fiorella_im @SarcasmStardust
Nucho Libre a retweeté Crimes of USA
Bernie is absolutely to the right of past candidates like Dennis Kucinich and Mike Gravel. He has tons of blood on his hands. E.g., he supported Iraq sanctions that killed hundreds of thousands.https://twitter.com/CrimesofUS/status/1098544112322646017 …
Nucho Libre ajouté,
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @nucholibre @SarcasmStardust
Lol you take your lists but refuse to go into complexity of how bills are bundled. Not all of this is accurate. Sanders long wanted to end our involvement in Yemen. Like every congressperson the only way to get shit done in this system is to stick a good amendment in one.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
Foreign policy don’t black and white. It’s very complex and if you’re going to simplify it you’re not doing it justice. This is very vague. You have to go through the bulk of the bills and see what was actually in them.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
Isn’t* Neither Sanders or anyone in power has really taken the MIC at all. Not the way they should be taking it. They can’t. The ones who do are murdered. So fixating on the guy who tried even if ill-fated, instead of the system is pedantic at best, a waste of time at worst
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @Fiorella_im @SarcasmStardust
Let's keep pretending that Bernie "had to compromise" to support interventions that killed hundreds of thousands and that deep down he's really a peacenik.pic.twitter.com/1gKXORApTw
2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @nucholibre @SarcasmStardust
No one is saying he didn’t make bad decisions and that he’s great on FP. That’s his weakness. But again that is how bills work. I’ve not seen a single member of Congress not vote for something bc it had a provision that benefitted something else. Further why focus on Sanders?
2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
I mean sure point out constructive flaws with receipts. With all the context and the full bills. But to say he’s more right wing or more dangerous than what we have is bogus. It doesn’t matter Egeos in charge. Tulsi, Bernie, Nina, AOC, Kucinach, the MIC & CIA are the issue.
-
-
In order to stop them we need to understand their power and what they do. Try running for office maybe not as a Democrat bc that party is done. But it’s not as easy to get shit done when we don’t go after the real culprits. We want to end imperialism? Starts with the source.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime - Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.