And once humanity reaches a certain point they’ll likely see it too.
-
-
Ce Tweet est indisponible.
-
-
-
-
Ce Tweet est indisponible.
-
No please. Though it would be ironic. People can do whatever they want but the government shouldn’t be involved.
Fin de la conversation
-
-
-
Not sure Catholics would agree with that statement. Many of whom I wouldn't consider religious fanatics. Statues are the least of our problems.
-
They are but the focusing on symbolism is a problem. I think people waste too much time arguing in favor or against. I think to really stop the argument it would be helpful to legitimately argue the government shouldn’t be sanctioning statues
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Only statues of animals
- Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
I disagree for two reasons. 1) Some people, even if not perfect, are sufficiently honest and improved human life significantly enough to have statues of them that examplify what is the closest to virtue.
-
2) Statues of historical figures are an integral part of art and and patrimony. Of course, we must question their place in public places when they promote hateful values, yet we mustn't destroy them. They are main pieces of study to understand history.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.

