As much as I appreciate what Tulsi did in 2016 and the courage she demonstrated. As much as I understand why she did it and will always think highly for her for doing what she did. The fact remains Tulsi should have stayed neutral & should have never endorsed Bernie openly.
-
-
No one is arguing the existence of sycophants. Every candidate has them. Her “popularity with progressives” is clearly conditional. And that condition was that she was not allowed to run, don’t move to the left of Bernie, and never introduce her own plans if bernie has one.
-
Her marginal popularity with the Bernie wing of progressives would have come regardless of whether or not she endorsed Bernie in 2016. It clearly was not worth the bullshit that came with it. Her support of him literally handicapped her the entire election.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Exactly which stands in the face of what she believes and frankly before now I had assumed the same with Mr. House. Tulsi was able to run the way she did this time because of Bernie. If she didn’t endorse how would she have ran this time? The dnc loved her, a darling campaign?or?
-
I think he's only referring to how her endorsing Bernie led to her colleagues shunning her and the MSM smearing her Not that her actions or progression would've been stunted or dodge the same desperate erasure of her come 2020. It'd definitely leave more room for doubt tho
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Bernie placed his “career over integrity” the MOMENT he embraced and pushed the OBVIOUS hoax that is/was Russiagate.. That he was viciously/effectively Russiagated by his fellow Russiagaters is as karmic as we’re liable to perceive in this plane..
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.