This sounds exactly like Tulsi’s “Single-Payer Plus.” It would create a two-tiered healthcare system all to keep private insurance companies happy. Every year they’d eat into the public plan by lobbying for more privatization. We’d all likely need to buy supplemental under this.https://twitter.com/JohnDelaney/status/1204073780462657536 …
-
0:21 -
En réponse à @HumanistReport
Another disingenuous post. Full of misinformation. What she’s advocating is not a public option. Clearly she stated this multiple times. You can’t opt out. I think she should put out her full platform once and for all but she’s spoken about it multiple times.
4 réponses 9 Retweets 75 j'aime -
En réponse à @Fiorella_im @HumanistReport
BS, Single Payer M4A will only work if We are All In, there is no reason on this earth that for profit insurance needs to exist, period.
@TulsiGabbard plan is a stab in the back to Single Payer M4A and you would cut off your nose to spite yourself to defend Gabbard!#subterfuge2 réponses 0 Retweet 4 j'aime -
Uh lol calm down. Facts: Private insurance exists in form under all single payer systems. Whether we like it or not. It’s there for mostly non covered areas. Examples of a plan similar to Gabbards exist in Australia and Finland. I believe we should Nationalize healthcare.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 2 j'aime
The only point I’m making is that what the original post stated is false & IS misinformation. As a progressive I stand with the truth. I have my preference on who’s is better and I’ve made that very clear. But I won’t tell lies to uphold my candidate. His policy does it for me.
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.