For a number of reasons, I have decided not to attend the December 19th "debate" — regardless of whether or not there are qualifying polls. I instead choose to spend that precious time directly meeting with and hearing from the people of New Hampshire and South Carolina.
-
-
En réponse à @TulsiGabbard
Tulsi’s voice is certainly needed. She will be missed. I hope she’s back for the next one. I still think it superficially means success in a lot of people’s minds. That said, I understand her tactic & why she’s doing it. People are seeing these debates are full of bs!
58 réponses 36 Retweets 624 j'aime -
En réponse à @Fiorella_im @TulsiGabbard
Her voice is busy stealing votes in NH and SC instead of on stage exposing Pete Buttigieg for who is. Is this what an ally does? Genuine question.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 4 j'aime -
Ce Tweet est indisponible.
-
Forgive me, but good. Anti establishment is not the same thing as progressive.
4 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
I agree. But regurgitating smears isn’t the same thing as having proof. Tulsi is progressive period. Her legislative record shows it. She’s not just anti-establishment. I’d say Yang is anti-establishment & not necessarily progressive. That symbol on your profile of Bolivia? She..
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.