How awesome would it be if it just stayed at this number? We’d be able to have an actual debate for once!https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/us/politics/democratic-debate-lineup.html …
-
-
En réponse à @TrippySocialist
Nope. They are unfairly shutting Gabbard and Yang our. That’s not fair even if it would benefit us. It doesn’t.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 10 j'aime -
En réponse à @Fiorella_im
The debate qualifications are way too lenient as it is. People polling at 4% or less nationally really have no business being on stage at this point.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 3 j'aime
En réponse à @TrippySocialist
I disagree. Polls don’t say much. Bernie was polling VERY low this time in 2015/16 election. Gabbard is closer to 6% as is Yang. Plus even if you want to talk about how they shouldn’t bc of low polling, doesn’t mean we condone corruption. Otherwise we aren’t truly progressive.
13:30 - 2 déc. 2019
0 réponse
0 Retweet
1 j'aime
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.