Thread Katie Hill: Imma break my silence on this bc I see too many progs who don’t know CA politics be tricked into thinking we have progressives in congress here & we don’t. 1) @KatieHill4CA SHOULD HAVE RESIGNED & it’s fair she did...https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2019-10-27/rep-katie-hill-resigns-amid-scandal …
-
Afficher cette discussion
-
there’s a clear protocol. She was also likely* suggested by house leadership. 2) The whole “abusive husband” & “right-wing” attacks are fabrications from the establishment in the California Democratic Party, a cesspool for sexual misconduct, often protecting sexual predators...
1 réponse 2 Retweets 20 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
like Eric Bauman, who most fell silent until exposing him was the best political move. The right didn’t do this. Once again Democrats blame someone else for their mistakes. The entire country has gotten a taste of our CA Dem Party Bullshit. The drama, the sexual predatory...
2 réponses 0 Retweet 15 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
nature of candidates, the corruption, & those who protect it. It’s clear that the Democratic Party in general but specifically and especially in CA, protects, supports & endorses sexual predators. They silence women, & anyone who tries to hold them accountable. 3) Katie Hill...
1 réponse 1 Retweet 12 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
is not really the victim here, though she is a victim in the sense of falling prey to the endless enabling from corrupt officials inside the party. We talk about it all the time. People like
@MuyMexi are the ones attacked & silenced for exposing corruption. It’s gross.1 réponse 1 Retweet 13 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
4) Hill is not & was never a progressive. She’s an AIPAC, pro a Israel darling & has unlike she claims, taken corp PAC $, has terrible stances if any on foreign policy, & is constantly promoted by J Street. The majority of the CADEM establishment supports her. Enough said.
2 réponses 1 Retweet 21 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
Notice the defense PACS & in general most PACS are problematic if they rely only on the Democratic Party. Notice Nancy Pelosi donated to her.pic.twitter.com/FnHyspOAMM
1 réponse 2 Retweets 14 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
Bottom line: We seriously need to stop naming every new congress person progressive without looking at their money & record.
2 réponses 3 Retweets 28 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
Btw in case it isn’t clear: It is specifically against the House rules to have sexual relations with members of your staff. The rules apply explicitly to Congressional staff, it could extend to campaign staff. She was likely asked to resign by leadership bc her actions would...
1 réponse 0 Retweet 10 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
cause her to lose re-election. She was in a republican district. For Dems it’s not convenient to keep a losing candidate in but moreover especially with that past. Had she been in state rep she’s been likely fine. But this is bringing attention to corrupt CA they don’t want.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 13 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion
One last thing: Not only was she having sexual relations with her staffer, but there's evidence she was using significant amounts of campaign funds to pay for the young woman.
-
-
Ce Tweet est indisponible.
-
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.