“Let me just make up actual conspiracy theories & help the establishment with my bs!” But he’s SO FAIR to Gabbard. Lollll I swear half of me hopes asteroid 2020 hits because the idiocy is astounding.https://twitter.com/HumanistReport/status/1187598405708607489 …
-
-
En réponse à @Fiorella_im
He's 100% correct. Tulsi's 2015 endorsement was her fishing for cranks, and it worked. She was Iran Hawk "Call it Radical Islam" Tulsi prior to that. She should have endorsed Bernie months ago.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 7 j'aime -
En réponse à @MattLech
Wrong. BC: Tulsi 2015 was endorsed by the DNC. Endorsed by Neera Tanden. Endorsed and preferred by the entire Democratic Party as the young one to be the next Hillary. You can find videos of these centrists praising her. It makes 0 sense she’d give that up to fake support...
1 réponse 0 Retweet 5 j'aime -
En réponse à @Fiorella_im @MattLech
for a guy that cost her so much career wise and turned everyone against her. So idiots can come on and make up conspiracy theories that have no logic. You don’t give up power to support an unpopular candidate to the party to later get popularity. Lmao so stupid.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 5 j'aime -
Ce Tweet est indisponible.
-
En réponse à @hollowsceneexit @MattLech
She was going to be the leader (chair of the dnc in 2016). And they wanted her to run for POTUS in the future. You can look it up yourself. It makes zero sense she’s give up power already there if she was trying to gain it. Especially when supporting Bernie was fringe.
3 réponses 1 Retweet 8 j'aime -
Ce Tweet est indisponible.
I was involved w Bernie since 2015. Anyone involved then should know how the establishment thought of Tulsi before. Yes we know. They loved her. It makes zero logical sense for her to get anything out of it. It was a long shot campaign. She had more “promise” endorsing Clinton.
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.